To date, including Matilda the Musical, seventeen feature films have been adapted from Roald Dahl’s work to varying degrees of success — here are all of the Roald Dahl movies, ranked from worst to best. Including several repeat adaptations, some of the beloved author's poetry and short stories, and of course his dark but charming children's stories, there is a real spectrum in those adaptations. Born in Wales to Norwegian parents, Dahl’s books are popular worldwide, and he is known for his darkly comic children’s stories that never fail to delight. Traditionally accompanied by Quentin Blake’s gorgeous illustrations, Dahl’s work lends itself to film very well.
In fact, he even worked on a number of screenplays - including Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and the James Bond film You Only Live Twice. He tended to dislike adaptations of his own work, aside from a few notable exceptions. Given Dahl’s extensive bibliography, it’s a wonder that more Roald Dahl movies haven’t manifested over the years, though Netflix are due to produce a string of animated Dahl projects in the near future, including Taika Waititi’s take on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and its lesser-known sequel, Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator. As they currently stand, here’s every Roald Dahl movie adaptation ranked from worst to best.
17 Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory (2017)
The most insulting out of all the Roald Dahl movies by a country-mile, Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory manages to butcher both properties - its dedication to the late Gene Wilder (who played Wonka in the 1971 classic) feeling like a slap in the face to the great actor’s memory. It’s basically an animated remake of the original film, but with Tom and Jerry added for seemingly no reason at all. Essentially, it’s a feature-length meme and feels like something the animators pitched when they ran out of ideas, only to regret their choices during the actual production of the movie.
16 Roald Dahl’s Esio Trot (2015)
Esio Trot is one of Dahl’s lesser-known works, and one of the least known Roald Dahl movies, about a lonely old man (Dustin Hoffman) falling in love with his tortoise-keeping neighbor (Judi Dench in one of her worst roles) and hatching a plan to win her affection. While that might be an unusual plot for a children’s story, Dahl made it work, with a heightened, comic tone and snappy pacing throughout. The TV movie, adapted by Richard Curtis, is a by-the-numbers rom-com that pads out the plot with cliche, unnecessary conflict, and offers little kid-appeal while simultaneously patronizing older viewers.
15 Breaking Point (1989)
An adaptation of the short story Beware of the Dog, the 1989 TV movie Breaking Point took an intriguing plot and overinflated it with theatricality, poor writing, and cheap effects and is one of the worst Roald Dahl movies. The reason Dahl's short story was a success was the darkness found in its subtlety, something Breaking Point clearly didn't know how to recreate. Between the overacting and the pacing issues, Breaking Point was an all-around mess. What's worse is that the film was supposed to be a remake of the 1964 film 36 Hours, which truthfully didn't fare any better.
14 36 Hours (1964)
36 Hours is an adaptation of Dahl’s WWII short story Beware of the Dog, about an RAF pilot who wakes up in a “British” hospital but begins to suspect that his caregivers have ulterior motives. It’s a great premise, one of Dahl’s best, but the film doesn’t really go anywhere with it, building tension and suspense in the first half, before tossing every cliche at its audience in the second. Neither of the Roald Dahl movies based on Beware of the Dog are good enough to recommend, nor bad enough to laugh at, which is mostly all that can be said for both.
13 The Witches (2020)
A toothless adaptation of Dahl’s classic novel, Robert Zemeckis’s The Witches isn't one of the best Roald Dahl movies and re-locates the story to the American South, with Jahzir Kadeem Bruno playing an orphan who is turned into a mouse by the Grand High Witch (Anne Hathaway) and her minions. Teaming up with his grandmother (Octavia Spencer), the boy-mouse races to overthrow the witches’ plans to rid the world of children.
Sadly, the film is more concerned with CGI spectacle than storytelling and ends up falling extremely flat. Though it retains most of Dahl’s plot, the film lacks his heart and feels cheaply made. While Robert Zemeckis has some great movies, The Witches wasn't quite an example of one. Despite Anne Hathaway delivering an enchanting performance, audiences saw through its effects for what the movie really was: a cash-grab, looking to ride on Nicolas Roeg’s coattails and the cult status of his 1990 adaptation.
12 Four Rooms (1995)
Four Rooms — an anthology film, with segments directed by Robert Rodriguez, Quentin Tarantino, Allison Anders, and Alexandre Rockwell — is likely the strangest of all Roald Dahl movies; inspired by his adult short stories and starring Tim Roth as a bellhop who can’t catch a break. Each director wrote their own chunk of the script, with Roth encountering a variety of strange guests in the hotel from Hell.
As is often the case with anthology films, some of the segments are more effective than others, leading to a disted feature that might be of interest to Tarantino fans, but will likely alienate general audiences. At the very least, it’s bold, with an outsized, comedic performance from Roth, a questionable cameo from Quentin Tarantino, and a fun, animated title sequence that recalls the work of Saul Bass and Chuck Jones.
11 Charlie And The Chocolate Factory (2005)
The weirdest of the “straight” adaptations of Roald Dahl movies, Tim Burton’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is an ill-advised mess, with Johnny Depp’s performance as Wonka clearly (and regrettably) based on Michael Jackson. Intellectually, this connection makes sense, with Wonka portrayed as psychologically stunted in some way as a result of childhood trauma. However, in practice he’s unlikeable and creepy and, largely, insufferable.
The rest of the film also feels off. Like Dahl’s book, it’s sinister, but not in the right way, and (in a bizarre sequence) explores Wonka’s childhood under the iron fist of his dentist father (Christopher Lee). The whole thing is like a parody of a Tim Burton film, steeped in Gothicism whether it suits the material or not, and, for that reason, is almost worth seeing. While Depp has jumped the shark many a time, Willy Wonka might be his greatest acting sin yet.
10 The BFG (2016)
The BFG, based on Roald Dahl’s novel about a young girl being whisked away to the land of giants, is one of director Steven Spielberg’s biggest box-office failures. Ultimately it was a harsh indictment of what is, by most s, a perfectly okay movie, but certainly not the leader of the Roald Dahl movies pack. Stacked with CGI and whimsy (in that order), the film sanitizes Dahl’s vision somewhat, though Mark Rylance delivers in the title role.
Spielberg certainly attempts to imbue the proceedings with a sense of wonder, but things tend to feel pretty forced — like someone who’s become bored re-telling the same bedtime story, over and over again. It’s not bad, but it’s definitely not great either, which actually makes it far less interesting than some of the lower entries in this list.
9 Revolting Rhymes (2016)
Revolting Rhymes, loosely based on Dahl’s poetry collection of the same name, is an animated TV movie that riffs on classic fairytales with a darkly comic twist. Out of all the Roald Dahl movies, it's one of the most kid-friendly. Aimed primarily at young children, it feels understandably cutesy but manages to link the stories well, something that the book doesn’t really attempt. Re-telling classic fairytales with a subversive twist has become a subgenre unto itself and, while Revolting Rhymes is entertaining enough, Dahl’s poems are shorter and funnier than the film is ultimately able to muster.
8 Danny, The Champion Of The World (1989)
One of the few adaptations that Dahl actively endorsed, Danny, the Champion of the World is an underrated gem in the world of Roald Dahl movies. The TV movie tells the story of Danny and his father William (the usually villainous Jeremy Irons) who plot to overturn a millionaire’s plans to buy their land by poaching his pheasants. Like Dahl’s book, it’s understated and charming, with a wonderful father/son relationship at its heart - played by real-life father/son duo Jeremy and Samuel Irons. Robbie Coltrane is menacing as the despotic millionaire, and the Oxfordshire scenery shines in every frame, though the pacing is a little slow at times.
