There were bo biases, the OPINION that the ending and multi-player in ME3 were unsatisfactory is valid. Bias would be "I don't like sci fi settings, so this game didn't really do it for me." Legitimate complaints about aspect of the game that weren't enjoyed is not that. Ultimately how enjoyable or good something is will be subjective but ME3 multi-player was really close to objectively bad.

I know the nature of all of the companion side quests have this choice at the end to determine which armor set or ive they get, but I just feel like it was poorly implemented overall. Most are deeply personal issues that Rook has no business influencing let alone just making the decision on. This one in particular feels like it should be up to the griffins really. They're intelligent enough and as much as there aren't actually consequences either way, the fact they were abused by wardens in the past combined with what a giant a**hole the first warden is (even if you go the attempted "redemption" path) makes me less inclined to just send them back and assume they're gonna be fine.

I havent looked at metrics but the only possible way that monk is unpopular is if you are specifically talking about tav and if so when you are solely comsidering tav I would assume the top choices in no particular order are pally bard sorcerer and warlock because a tav with no rizz is gonna have a bad time. Monks are well known to be one of if not the most busted thing in the game (stealth archer builds probably higher but it's more mechanically intensive) and dexterity is not the most important stat, though in fairness try hards will dump strength and use elixirs. an article informing us water is wet would have been equally informative