You said that FD4 is your favourite... it's literally the worst movie in the entire franchise. Other horror franchises with bad films tell themselves "at least our worst is still better than the fourth Final Destination movie!"

Your opinion is therefore irrelevant.

I think the point was more separating him from The Void left Bob doubting himself. It's repeatedly been said that Sentry can only actually lose if he "wants" to, or doubts himself enough to believe that he can (then subconsciously wanting to lose).

In theory, that works because Knull made Sentry believe that he could lose, making him vulnerable. Until his displaced psyche becomes confident again, he won't/can't use his powers to reform.

It's an overly convoluted way of clearing the board of a character that is so powerful that he tips the balance too much when he's there, but making it possible for him to be brought back when they find a way to make him work.

Yeeeeaaahhhh... you've missed out on the most important factor there.

The cinemas take a cut of anything from 40-60% of all tickets sold (kind of how they run as a business and pay employees), so Disney likely only get 50% of the box office gross back.

That means that they've currently only taken around $85m back against their investment (you forgot to add distribution costs, but you also it that you low-balled the marketing, so you know it's likely at least 50m higher than the 370m you said).

Disney could be looking at pocketing less than $100m against and outlay that could be closer to $425-450m... that's a loss of over $300m (hahahahahahaha!)

The intent is to highlight specific bits of information, to allow people who just skim read to get the gist of the article.

I get what you're saying though - it reads like they're highlighting information, rather than opinion.