"Jeanne d'Arc" not only adds monsters to the Hundred Years War, but also erroneously makes Joan of Arc into a fighter, which was denied by both Joan herself and the numerous eyewitness s which all describe her carrying her banner in battle rather than fighting, and she bluntly denied fighting.

"The ion of Joan of Arc" may have been well done in of cinematography, but in of historical accuracy it relied far too heavily on a single document (the trial transcript) which is contradicted on important points by virtually everything else. Many eyewitnesses who were at Joan of Arc's trial said that the English government manipulated the trial (as we also know from English government records) and the transcript was falsified on crucial issues such as her alleged refusal to submit to the Church (which the eyewitnesses said wasn't true), her alleged reasons for clinging to her soldier's outfit (which she said, as quoted by eyewitnesses, was to allow her to keep it laced up into one piece to prevent her guards from pulling her clothing off), and many other issues. The film may be better than most of the more recent films on the subject, but it isn't accurate.

-

This article claims Joan of Arc (Jeanne d'Arc) was executed as a witch, but if you look at the trial transcript you'll see that the witchcraft charges had been dropped before the final set of 12 accusations were drawn up. She was convicted for "relapsing" into wearing a soldier's riding outfit, which the bailiff, Jehan Massieu, said was the result of the guards taking away her dress and forcing her to put the soldier's clothing back on, then the pro-English judge used that as an excuse to condemn her. The inclusion of Amelia Earheart and Marie Antoinette as "witches" is even more bizarre.