Summary

  • Guilty pleasure movies are often misunderstood gems that deserve more appreciation and respect.
  • Starship Troopers, Batman Forever, and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull are underrated classics.
  • John Carter, Cars 2, and The Lone Ranger offer unique stories and themes that challenge the conventions of their genres.

The term "guilty pleasure" is often used to describe a movie that someone can only enjoy in secret, for fear of what the wider public thinks of the movie. Often, this means that a guilty pleasure movie is one that is typically looked down upon. However, I would argue that guilty pleasure is a term that is thrown around far too often when discussing unloved movies. But what if these guilty pleasures aren't actually guilty? What if they're just actually good movies?

From the vastness of space to these so-called "guilty pleasures" are actually truly great movies. They often provide endearing stories full of compelling characters, yet for one reason or another, whether that's their box-office performance or a misunderstanding of the themes, these movies get treated very harshly. It's time to set the record straight, and embrace these movies for the misunderstood gems that they actually are.

10 Starship Troopers (1997)

Misunderstood Upon Release

Neil Patrick Harris as Carl Jenkins touching a bug in Starship Troopers

Starship Troopers, directed by Paul Verhoeven, is an adaptation of the 1959 novel of the same by Robert A. Heinlein. It tells the story of teenager Johnny Rico (Casper Van Dien), who enlists in the military of the United Citizen Federation, a government that rules over the Earth. Earth is engaged in a war with an extraterrestrial bug species known as Arachnids. Upon release, it was heavily criticized for its alleged fascistic themes, and underperformed at the box office.

While a small group of fans now consider Starship Troopers to be a misinterpreted cult-classic, it deserves more than this modicum of appreciation. Starship Troopers is a sharp satire of militarized fascism, with its exaggerated nationalism and excessive violence acting as a critique of this. The cast is excellent, from Van Dien's performance as Johnny, to Denise Richards as his girlfriend, Carmen, and all the add to Starship Troopers' charm. It is a movie that is well-deserving of a re-evaluation, and an apology.

Starship Troopers Movie Poster

Your Rating

Starship Troopers
Release Date
November 7, 1997
Runtime
129 minutes
Director
Paul Verhoeven

WHERE TO WATCH

Streaming

Writers
Edward Neumeier
Studio(s)
TriStar Pictures, Touchstone Pictures
Distributor(s)
TriStar Pictures

9 John Carter (2012)

What's In A Name?

John Carter about to hurl a rock at gigantic Martian beasts in John Carter.

John Carter is potentially only known to many audiences for its atrocious box office numbers, becoming one of Disney's worst ever financial investments in a movie. John Carter tells the story of the titular character after he is accidentally transported to a planet he knows as Mars and must attempt to navigate this new, alien terrain. It was criticized for its slightly predictable story and low box-office numbers, but beyond these, John Carter is truly worthy of more appreciation.

Chief among these is the sheer impressive scale of the movie, with its visually stunning effects and incredible score by Michael Giacchino. The cast all give solid performances as well, adding to the depth of the movie, with Taylor Kitsch's performance as John Carter being particularly impressive. If only the movie wasn't given the rather boring name, John Carter, more people would have been interested in watching it, and giving this titan of a movie the respect and commercial success it probably deserved.

John Carter Movie Poster

Your Rating

John Carter
Release Date
March 9, 2012
Runtime
132 minutes
Director
Andrew Stanton

WHERE TO WATCH

Streaming

Writers
Michael Chabon, Mark Andrews, Andrew Stanton
Studio(s)
Disney
Distributor(s)
Disney

8 Batman Forever (1995)

A Refreshing Diversion From Batman's Tone

Jim Carrey as the Riddler destroying the Batcave in Batman Forever

In fairness to Batman Forever, any movie that has to follow Batman (1989) and Batman Returns (1992) would have a hard job of living up to them. However, a lot of the criticism leveled towards Batman Forever, making it many people's guilty pleasure Batman movie to watch, is extremely unfounded. One of the main problems that people have with Batman Forever is its lighter tone and colorful approach when compared to the two previous movies, but it is arguably this change in tone that makes the movie so underrated.

The iconic, over-the-top performances of Jim Carrey as The Riddler and Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face are some of the highlights of the movie, and push the narrative forward in a fun and exciting way. While a more "family-friendly" approach to a live-action Batman movie may have been a misguided idea, it's hard to deny that Batman Forever made the most out of the premise. Overall, it's a fun superhero movie with two all-time great Batman villains in it, and should not be a guilty pleasure of anyone.

Batman Forever Movie Poster

Your Rating

Batman Forever
Release Date
June 9, 1995
Runtime
117 Minutes
Director
Joel Schumacher
  • Headshot of Val Kilmer
    Val Kilmer
    Dick Grayson / Robin
  • Headshot Of Chris O'Donnell
    Chris O'Donnell
    Bruce Wayne / Batman

WHERE TO WATCH

Writers
Bob Kane, Lee Batchler, Janet Scott Batchler, Akiva Goldsman
Studio(s)
PolyGram Pictures, Tim Burton Productions
Distributor(s)
Warner Bros. Pictures

7 Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull (2008)

Keeping The Franchise Fresh

Harrison Ford in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

The fourth installment in the Indiana Jones franchise was met with a lukewarm response from both critics and audiences. Too much CGI, too little storytelling, and far too many aliens, are often among those criticisms aimed at Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. The CGI-heavy action sequences may detract from Kingdom of the Crystal Skull's story, but this is ultimately a superficial problem and should not have warranted the treatment of the movie to have been so harsh.

It is a movie that kept the franchise fresh, taking new characters on new adventures, and still maintains that same spirit of exploration and fun that defined the original trilogy.

Introducing a son for Indiana (Harrison Ford) to interact with was a controversial choice, but nevertheless, one that adds a greater layer of depth and nuance to Kingdom of the Crystal Skull's storyline while still honoring the archeology legend. It is a movie that kept the franchise fresh, taking new characters on new adventures, and still maintains that same spirit of exploration and fun that defined the original trilogy. This movie is not a guilty pleasure, it's a pleasure to watch.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Movie Poster

Your Rating

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Release Date
May 22, 2008
Runtime
122 Minutes
Director
Steven Spielberg

WHERE TO WATCH

Writers
David Koepp, George Lucas, Jeff Nathanson
Studio(s)
Lucasfilm
Distributor(s)
Paramount Pictures

6 The Hobbit: The Battle Of The Five Armies (2014)

A True Fantasy Epic

Lee Pace leading the elves in The Hobbit the Battle of the Five Armies

While not at the same standard of quality as the Hobbit movies that came before it, and absolutely nowhere near the Lord of the Rings trilogy, The Battle of the Five Armies remains a heartfelt movie full of grand spectacle and emotional hits. Of course, the glaring issue many people point to is the fact that the filmmakers stretched one book into three movies of at least two and a half hours each. As such, many people have criticized The Battle of the Five Armies unfairly, calling its story bloated, and its production a cash-grab.

It may have stretched out Bilbo Baggins' (Martin Freeman) story longer than was necessary, but that doesn't make The Battle of the Five Armies a hollow movie at all. It manages to nail the actual battle itself (though the CGI is, ittedly, soulless at times) and produces a satisfying conclusion to the Hobbit trilogy. The movie also manages to balance this grand spectacle with intimate moments of emotional resonance, and I do not doubt that fans, one day, will look upon The Battle of the Five Armies in a new, positive light.

The Hobbit The Battle Of the Five Armies Movie Poster

Your Rating

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
Release Date
December 17, 2014
Runtime
144 Minutes
Director
Peter Jackson

WHERE TO WATCH

Writers
Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson, Guillermo del Toro, J.R.R. Tolkien
Distributor(s)
Warner Bros. Pictures
Main Genre
Adventure

5 Cars 2 (2011)

Overhated For Its Tonal Shift

Michael Caine Voices Finn McMissile In Disney Pixar's Cars 2

A spy movie, but with cars! What's not to love? According to both critics and fans alike, a lot, with Cars 2 often placing very low in Pixar rankings. Cars 2 was a daring departure from the premise of the 2006 original, focusing on Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) as he is mistaken for a spy by Finn McMissile (Michael Caine), and unwittingly recruited into his mission. Audiences were surprised to see such a deviation from the tone of the first movie - from a small-town story to an international mission of espionage to uncover a conspiracy about the World Grand Prix.

Tonal whiplash aside, Cars 2 is a movie that still has a great, action-packed story to tell. Audiences get to learn more about the Cars universe, while Pixar's CGI efforts and technical prowess are on full display. This isn't even mentioning the rather mature messaging about being true to oneself and the importance of loyalty. It's a downright great movie and does not deserve the unfair status of guilty pleasure at all.

0168104_poster_w780.jpg

Your Rating

Cars 2
Release Date
June 24, 2011
Runtime
106 minutes
Director
John Lasseter
  • Headshot Of Larry The Cable Guy
    Larry the Cable Guy
    Mater (voice)
  • Headshot Of Owen Wilson In The 2006 MTV Movie Awards
    Lightning McQueen (voice)

WHERE TO WATCH

Streaming
BUY

Writers
Ben Queen
Studio(s)
Disney
Distributor(s)
Disney

4 Avengers: Age Of Ultron (2015)

A Solid MCU Installment

Avengers: Age of Ultron is a great superhero movie. The introduction of so many new characters and subplots may appear convoluted at first, but it merely elevates Age of Ultron to new heights. The primary issue with the movie is how Ultron himself was arguably wasted by dying at the end, and should have appeared in more MCU projects. But even this cannot detract from the action-packed narrative of a movie that sees the Avengers team up once again to save the world.

Age of Ultron is not a guilty pleasure, it's a richly layered movie that doesn't even appear to notice the weight of the expectations on its back. It balances spectacle with intimacy, gives each member of the stacked ensemble cast their moment to shine, and sets the crucial groundwork for future acclaimed MCU projects, especially Captain America: Civil War (2016). If one had to pick a weakest Avengers movie, one would likely choose Age of Ultron out of instinct, but honestly, the movie deserves more than that.

0138099_poster_w780.jpg

Your Rating

Avengers: Age of Ultron
Release Date
May 1, 2015
Runtime
141 minutes
Director
Joss Whedon

WHERE TO WATCH

Writers
Joss Whedon
Studio(s)
Marvel Studios
Distributor(s)
Disney

3 Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017)

Love It Or Hate It, You Definitely Watched It

When audiences talk about divisive movies, Star Wars: Episode VIII - The Last Jedi will probably be mentioned. Loved by critics (91% on Rotten Tomatoes), questioned by audiences (41% on Rotten Tomatoes), but constantly talked about, The Last Jedi is actually a very good addition to the Star Wars franchise (via Rotten Tomatoes). The main critique that the movie faces is its constant subversion of expectations, especially in the way that Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) was portrayed.

Visually stunning, thematically rich, and above all, bold, The Last Jedi tried something new, and was crucified by fans for it.

Ultimately, audiences can feel how they want to feel about Luke's character, but it's impossible to deny that his disillusioned hermit arc in The Last Jedi is compelling to watch, with Hamill giving an excellent performance. Visually stunning, thematically rich, and above all, bold, The Last Jedi tried something new, and was crucified by fans for it. It's high time that the movie gets the respect it deserves for being such a visionary and ambitious entry to the franchise.

01359310_poster_w780.jpg

Your Rating

Star Wars: Episode VIII - The Last Jedi
Release Date
December 13, 2017
Runtime
152 minutes
Director
Rian Johnson

WHERE TO WATCH

Streaming

Writers
Rian Johnson
Studio(s)
Lucasfilm
Distributor(s)
Disney

2 The Lone Ranger (2013)

Disney's Western Is Criminally Underrated

Johnny Depp as Tonto behind a wall in The Lone Ranger

In a similar vein to John Carter, the primary reason that many audiences talk about The Lone Ranger is because of how badly it flopped at the box office. There is one infallible piece of criticism that cannot be disputed when it comes to The Lone Ranger, and that is the casting of Johnny Depp, a white man, as the Ranger's Native American companion, Tonto. Besides this major blunder, The Lone Ranger is one of the most unique, comedic, and dramatic Westerns of all time.

Yes, it is a long movie, with a runtime of over two and a half hours, but it's full of action, incredible set pieces, and razor sharp dialogue. In particular, The Lone Ranger's themes regarding the oppression of Native Americans in the US deserve to be appreciated more, sending a bold message to the historically whitewashed Western genre. Entertaining, epic, yet dark at times, The Lone Ranger should not be anywhere near the term guilty pleasure movie.

The Lone Ranger Disney Movie Poster

Your Rating

The Lone Ranger
Release Date
July 3, 2013
Runtime
2h 29m
Director
Gore Verbinski

WHERE TO WATCH

Writers
Ted Elliott, Justin Haythe, Terry Rossio
Studio(s)
Disney
Distributor(s)
Disney

1 Spider-Man 3 (2007)

Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker looking down at himself in a mirror in Spider-Man 3 deleted scene

It's certainly encouraging to see more people come to appreciate the third installment in Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy, yet it still remains controversial to like, for some reason (via iconic "emo Peter Parker" dance. This is a movie that deserves another shot at appreciation, with its apparently "overcrowded" narrative actually being one of the highlights of the movie.

This is a movie that deserves another shot at appreciation, with its apparently "overcrowded" narrative actually being one of the highlights of the movie.

The inevitable chaos that comes with having so much in the story makes Spider-Man 3 one of the most enjoyable Spider-Man movies ever. Every rewatch reveals a new detail that you missed the first time, giving the movie a timeless charm that still hasn't worn off. Sure, it's messy in parts, but this doesn't stop Spider-Man 3 being great fun while also being an ambitious addition to the series.

Sources: MovieWeb, Rotten Tomatoes.

01357311_poster_w780.jpg

Your Rating

Spider-Man 3
Release Date
May 3, 2007
Runtime
139 minutes
Director
Sam Raimi
  • Headshot Of Tobey Maguire IN The Global Premiere Screening Of Paramount Pictures 'Babylon'
    Spider-Man / Peter Parker
  • Headshot Of Kirsten Dunst
    Kirsten Dunst
    Mary Jane Watson

WHERE TO WATCH

Spider-Man 3 is the third entry in Sam Raimi's trilogy, where Tobey Maguire reprises his role as Peter Parker. Released in 2007, the film sees Spider-Man confronting new adversaries, including Sandman and Venom, while grappling with personal challenges involving an alien symbiote and complex relationships.

Writers
Sam Raimi, Alvin Sargent, Ivan Raimi
Studio(s)
Sony
Distributor(s)
Sony